翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Garcia Point ・ Garcia Report ・ Garcia River ・ Garcia River (Brazil) ・ Garcia River Forest ・ Garcia School ・ Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd ・ Garcia v. Google, Inc. ・ Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority ・ Garcia Wilderness ・ Garcia Álvarez de Figueroa ・ Garcia, California ・ Garcia, Colorado ・ Garcia, Tarragona ・ Garcia-class frigate ・ Garcia-Mir v. Meese ・ Garcia-Reynoso revolver ・ Garcia/Grisman ・ Garciadelia ・ Garciaparra ・ Garcias de Cisneros ・ Garciaz ・ Garcibarrigoa ・ Garcibuey ・ Garcie Peaks ・ Garciems Station ・ Garciez ・ Garcihernández ・ Garcilasismo ・ Garcilaso de la Vega Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Garcia-Mir v. Meese ： ウィキペディア英語版 Garcia-Mir v. Meese ''Garcia-Mir v. Meese'', 788 F.2d 1446 (11th Cir. 1986), was a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which ruled that the United States could detain indefinitely Cuban refugees who had arrived during the Mariel boatlift. ==Background== (詳細はCuban economy suffered a severe downturn. 10,000 Cubans attempted to gain asylum at the Peruvian Embassy in Havana, leading Fidel Castro and the Cuban government to allow anyone who wished so to leave the country via the Port of Mariel. Unknown to the United States, many of those permitted to leave had recently been released from prisons and mental institutions. In response to the mass number of exiles entering the country, the Carter administration and Congress passed the Refugee Education Assistance Act (8. U.S.C. § 1522), which allowed for the resettlement of and assistance to recent Cuban immigrants, as well as incarceration and deportation for particular Cuban nationals. U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, with the approval of President Reagan, proposed splitting the recent arrivals into two classes: one containing those previously convicted of crimes in Cuba, and another for those Cubans with no criminal records. Both classes were held at the Federal Penitentiary in Atlanta, Georgia. Moises Garcia-Mir and Rafael Fernandez-Roque, upon their arrival in Florida, were detained as possible security threats in Atlanta to await possible deportation. They brought their case to court and asserted a violation of both the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, citing Attorney General Meese as having abridged their right to due process. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia agreed with their claims, whereupon the Justice Department appealed to the Eleventh Circuit. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Garcia-Mir v. Meese」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.